Apr 30, 2009

Oregon Swine Flu Information Center

The State of Oregon has set up a Swine Flu website, with links to guides, local resources, and more.

There are, of course, other national and international sites you can visit for information, including the CDC , WHO, and PandemicFlu dot gov.

Previous post on The 2009 Flu.

Perils of a New Washington County (Oregon) Law Library Website

The newly redesigned Washington County (Oregon) website is up and running, however …

One of the many perils of migrating to a new county webpage is that links from this Oregon Legal Research blog to research guides on the Washington County (Oregon) Law Library’s (WCLL) webpage will be misdirected. Not all of them, but too many. I am slowly making my way through the cleanup, including updating previous blog post links to some of our most frequently used research guides.

Here is the list so far, with correct links for the guides I’ve been told are not linking properly from old posts. (You can also get to these guides from the WCLL webpage.)

1) How to Find Oregon Appellate Court Briefs

2) How to Find a Lawyer in Oregon in 6 Easy Steps

3) Portland-metro Area Legal Services Guide

4) CLEs for credit for Oregon attorneys (alpha and call number lists)

5) Uses for Old Law Books (How to Dispose of Used Law Books) (with Donation Checklist)

6) Oregon Legislative History Checklist

7) Washington County Law Library Services to the Public

8) Washington County Law Library Services to Oregon Attorneys

Apr 29, 2009

More Free and Low-Cost Legal Research Tools

An excellent, and fast, tutorial on free and low cost legal research tools is available from the Duke University law librarians: The Unexploded Cow’s Guide to Legal Research

My previous posts on free and low-cost legal research are here and here (with additional imbedded links).

Oregon Home Ownership Preservation Event (re Foreclosure): May 2, 2009

An event in the Portland metro area (previously blogged about), open to all Oregonians, to assist people who facing possible foreclosure:

Home Ownership Preservation Event

FREE
Open to the public
Saturday, May 2, 2009
10 a.m. to 7 p.m.
Portland Memorial Coliseum
300 Winning Way, Portland, OR 97208
Free parking
On the TriMet MAX line, Rose Quarter Transit Center

To register, please click
here or call (in Salem) 503-947-7854 or 503-947-7068. Please note that childcare will not be provided.

Other foreclosure posts on the Oregon Legal Research blog.

Apr 28, 2009

One Flu Over the Health Care Abyss

Government website on the flu: PandemicFlu dot gov. Also, from the CDC , WHO, Wikipedia and beyond, learn about Endemics, and pandemics and Epidemics.

Those of you who have read some histories of the Flu of 1918 (as opposed to reading just headlines), or some of the less overwrought news (e.g. at the CDC) may recall that there was a 1918 Springtime outbreak of flu that preceded the more virulent Autumn one. (I liked John Barry’s book, the Great Influenza, but there are others, many others.) You may also recall that those who caught the early, less virulent form either didn’t get the deadly one or had a better outcome if they did (they lived) than those who had not been exposed previously. They were, in purely layperson’s terms, “vaccinated.”

As my father used to say about Calculus 101. If you survived it, you had been vaccinated and were immune; you didn’t have to get it (take it) again. You might go on to get Calculus 201, but you had a better chance of survival than if you hadn’t been exposed previously to Calculus 101.

This is true in many ways. Those who are exposed the most over their lifetimes to the perils of germs and viruses and different types of food, and bigger perils (including temptation), are often tougher for it and are more likely to fight off future attacks and survive.

Nothing to fear but fear itself? Maybe, but do wash your hands, keep them in your pockets, and sneeze and cough the way you were taught as a child. And if you don’t have health insurance, call your Oregon and U.S. Senators and Representatives here or here.

Apr 27, 2009

Art and Law: the Intersection (via Maira Kalman)

If you missed the Maira Kalman and Justice Ginsburg May it Please the Court (and Pursuit of Happiness) illustrated article, from the New York Times, 4/23/09, catch it now.

If you were wondering about Maira Kalman, try her webpage or Wikipedia entry. She also has a presentation at the TED conference, a source of much other inspiration (about which I blogged a while ago).

Apr 24, 2009

Oregon Interest Rates: How Much Can They Charge?

A question frequently asked in law libraries: What is the highest interest rate imposed on debts allowed by Oregon law?

Here is my 2009 (before the end of the current 2009 Legislative Session) answer to the general question, when it comes to me via email.

(Note: if your situation is more complex than trying to figure out what the interest rate on that unpaid parking ticket is going to be, or what to charge your adult child for a car loan, I recommend you talk to an attorney. Answers to questions about interest rates on credit cards, on debts, on child support, on money judgments, etc. need more research than the average person can do “on the web.” NO, no, no - it is NOT all online.)

The very shortest answer to the general question is “It Depends!”

1) A less short and general answer, though maybe not responsive to your exact situation, might be the following, but see Disclaimer, below:

The maximum interest rate that can be charged in Oregon is 9 %. No one can charge more than the maximum rate of 9 % per year -- unless the lender is a financial institution. The maximum is specified by 2007 ORS 82.010. The exemptions are in 2007 ORS 82.025. The effect is that if you lend your favorite nephew money you can't charge more than 9 %. But if you are a bank or any other financial institution (and you will need to look up the statutory definition of “financial institution.”) you can charge any rate you want. Contracts have been written, and signed, at rates exceeding 50 % per year, which should surely give you pause.

When it comes to interest rates, “lawful” is in the eyes of the lawyers and the judges and the Legislators. A greater power may intervene so “stay on the side of the angels” is my advice.

2) There is also a good discussion of interest rates in Section IX (C), page 89, of the "Guide to Doing Business in Oregon" (by lawyers at the Davis, Wright, Tremaine law firm), "Applicability of State Usury Laws," which you can also link to from the "Lex Mundi Guides to Doing Business Guides" directory. As of today, the latest Oregon guide is dated 2006, so you will need to update it with the 2007 ORS, 2008 Laws (if any), and soon to be 2009 laws (if any).

3) For an answer that is relevant to your specific situation, you will need to do some careful research in the ORS or talk to a lawyer, which we highly recommend (and there is a good reason I keep saying this!). When searching the ORS, use the terms that relate to your specific situation, e.g. "interest," "loans," or "consumer finance," "credit card,” etc. These will lead you to a variety of statutes on this topic, which you will have to sift through to determine which ones apply to your situation.

4) I recommend you also check with an attorney, especially if there is property, family, or a business at stake, not just a hypothetical question. The Oregon State Bar Information and Referral Service has a toll free number to call to locate attorneys in your area; call their referral service at 503-684-3763 or 1-800-452-7636.

5) Last, but not least, if you have additional questions about interest rate policies, you might want to contact your state Legislators who make laws governing lending and interest rates. The Oregon Division of Corporate Finance and Securities, the Consumer Protection Division, and even the Governor’s office all have a role to play in how the state regulates the collection of interest:

a) Oregon State Legislature (and Find Your Legislator)

b) Oregon Division of Corporate Finance and Securities

c) Oregon Consumer Protection Hotline


Disclaimer: It is against state law for library staff members to engage in any conduct that might constitute the unauthorized practice of law (ORS 9.160, 9.166 and 9.21). They may not interpret statutes, cases or regulations, perform legal research, recommend or assist in the preparation of forms, or advise patrons regarding their legal rights. They may, however, assist patrons in locating materials or links that would aid in individual research.

Buying, Selling, Merging and Closing a Law Practice in Oregon

We’ve been getting excellent feedback on the ABA’s “Buying, Selling, Merging and Closing a Law Practice”.

When law partners part amicably, they may find that a how-to book is useful, but when they part less than amicably, they must have a book, forms, checklists, and sometimes more - a referee maybe?

In Oregon, attorneys also have the incomparable PLF staff members who advise Oregon attorneys on all sorts of legal practice, and getting out of practice, issues. New Oregon attorneys don’t automatically think about PLF and about just how many services are provided by the PLF. The PLF really wants to keep you out of trouble so they offer a lot of preventative care! Use them - the PLF, that is.


And, if you are a client of an attorney you cannot locate, call the Oregon State Bar.

Apr 23, 2009

Oregon House Bill "Wordle" Cloud

I saw the link to Wordle at a Jim Calloway blog post and decided to try it out with the text of a bill in the Oregon Legislature. Here is what Wordle does to it: 2009 HB 2813.

Wordle has some interesting uses, perhaps for writers who want a check on what their article, story, or other writing reveals about their use/overuse of certain words. If the word LIKE is bigger than all your other word, like wow, like get an editor - as if.

Apr 22, 2009

Peeps in the Law: Sweet

We all need a little bit of comic relief and today's suggestion comes to you from the lawyers and law librarians behind: "Top 3 ‘Peeps in Law’ Entries" from the ABA Journal Law News Now, Apr 13, 2009,by Molly McDonough.

Don't forget to click on the Peeps in Law Gallery for contest entries.

(Librarians also play Pimp My Bookcart for their comic relief.)

Consumer Law News and Advice in Oregon

The Oregonian’s Business section of the daily print paper has had such good consumer law and small business stories and information lately that I’m wondering why they call it Business, rather than Law or Working or Buying & Selling. (I’m sure one of their readers or reporters could come up with something better - naming newspaper sections is clearly not my bailiwick.)

That said, be sure to look at their consumer info, especially, but not only, the Complaint Desk. I cut out some of the best Oregon consumer news from local newspapers and more than one of my library patrons has benefited from that old-fashioned “vertical file” of articles. Some samples from the Complaint Desk:

1) Get past the operator; find real people

2) How to research a company

3) And there’s even a Past Columns with Updates!

They also keep up with some of the Legislature’s consumer law activity, e.g. new Oregon laws on debt collection: SB 386 and SB 328 (both of which the Governor has signed into law).

And see also, the Oregon Department of Justice, Attorney General website

As you would expect, there is also an awful lot of consumer law news on the web. I visit these frequently:

1) The Unsponsored Link

2) Nolo Press blogs

3) National Consumer Law Center

4) FTC Bureau of Consumer Protection

Apr 20, 2009

Digital Rights Management, End Users, and the FTC

Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Town Hall / Conference on DRM

Given how complex EULAs are (to the tune of whatever EULA wants, EULA gets), we don't get enough questions about them from the public. (Librarians are always agonzing over them, law abiding souls that we are.)

Also, Ars Technica has this interesting post about real-people reactions to DRM:

Some excerpts: “… And just stuffing the disclosure into the fine print of an End User License Agreement (EULA) isn't good enough. "If your advertising giveth and your EULA taketh away," she said, "don't be surprised if the FTC comes calling."

She stressed that it was not permissible for companies to play Lucy to consumers' Charlie Brown, holding the football and promising that this time she won't yank it away at the last minute. Promising "if you buy our DRM downloads, we won't shut down the authentication serves this time," she said, wasn't enough….

Besides, "DRM technologies are for the most part transparent," Attaway added, pointing to DVDs as his example. DVDs just work; no one has to think about DRM, it gets out of the way and allows people to enjoy films while preventing them from making a copy for everyone on the block….
… This brought an almost incredulous response from Jason Schultz, who heads the Samuelson Law, Technology, and Public Policy Clinic at UC-Berkeley. Consumers certainly are befuddled and angered by DRM, even the relatively tame version found on DVDs, he said
“ (link to full post)

Oregon Lawyer Newsletters, Journals, and Newspapers

I don't generally put Works in Progress up on this blog, but I get questions about these publications and have been working on the following list in my spare time. But it’s slow going - spare time is a rare gift. It may be useful even in its draft form:

OSB Section Newsletters (periodic): This is only a partial list. New ones will be added over time:

1) Administrative Law section (some newsletters are free online)

2) Debtor-Creditor Section newsletter (online only to OSB section members)

3) Estate Planning and Administration (previous issues of the newsletter are free online)

4) Family Law (newsletter is available free online)

5) Litigation Section (previous issues of the Litigation Journal newsletter are free online)

6) Real Estate and Land Use (RELU) (online only to OSB section members)

OTHER OREGON LEGAL or LAW-RELATED PUBLICATIONS:

1) OSB Bulletin (monthly) (available free to the public)

2) Oregon Law Reviews and Journals (1, 2 or 4x year): these are Oregon law school publications. The Index to Legal Periodicals (ILP), 18xx-present and Legal Resources Index (LRI),1980-present, (both subscription databases). Full runs of these journals are on HeinOnline (also by subscription only).

3) Daily Journal of Commerce (Oregon edition) serves as a paper of record for legal news and many legal notices.

4) Oregon Legal News Sources: Many, including, but not limited to Justia Blawg Search (type “Oregon” into the search box, then click on Sort by Date)
Oregon Daily Journal of Commerce (subscription required for full access, but their blog is open for viewing)

5) Oregon Lawyer Blogs (not inclusive - visit individual blogs for additional links)

Apr 16, 2009

Oregon Nonprofit Leaders Conference April 27-28, 2009

Visit the Oregon Nonprofit Leaders Conference website for more information. And look at their sponsors and their resource lists too.

Meet with grant makers and grant writers, learn about managing staff and finances, and meet with others who have the same questions you do.

Nonprofits in Oregon have excellent resources for learning how to run effective and fiscally sound nonprofit organizations. Visit the TACS website.

When Lawyers Sue Legal Publishers: Contracts and/or Ethics?

This is an interesting story:

Law Professors Seek Injunction over 'Sham' Treatise Supplement, by Shannon P. Duffy, The Legal Intelligencer, April 16, 2009.

Excerpt: “An ugly dispute has erupted between West Publishing and two law professors who claim they were falsely identified as the authors of an annual supplement to a treatise on Pennsylvania criminal law even though they had nothing to do with writing it.

In a federal lawsuit, professors David Rudovsky of the University of Pennsylvania and Leonard Sosnov of Widener Law School claim that the December 2008 supplement, or "pocket part," to their book, "Pennsylvania Criminal Procedure -- Law, Commentary and Forms," was so poorly researched that it will harm their reputations if allowed to remain on library shelves…. "
(link to full story)

The story is also a serious reminder to read your publishing contracts. I last posted about this here, with links to Google class action settlement stories. And, the Oregon State Bar, in the April 2009 Bulletin, has an important notice to OSB members who may be affected by that Google class action settlement.

Mexican and other Foreign Court Records Indexes and Databases

PI Buzz has a post, with Comments, about a Mexican court records database: Mexico Court Record Index Online.

Finding other countries’ court records databases doesn’t appear to be that difficult in a Google World, however, you should always try and talk to people who use those databases professionally to find out the pitfalls, the shortcomings, the strengths, and the alternatives. Private investigators and librarians who specialized in public and criminal records searching are excellent resources for database evaluations.

(PI Buzz also has a series of articles about Sunshine Week and government transparency.)

Apr 15, 2009

More Pigs (and Cows) and the Law

An Oregon county law library colleague found the “pig” case we were looking for (previous pig post), except it turns out to be cows, not pigs - yoinks!

(In everyone's defense, the students thought they were looking for a case about foreseeability or proximate cause, not res ipsa loquitur - and a pig and a gate and The Law - or so their instructors told them.)

From my colleague: “Perhaps we are seeking the wrong barnyard animal? There is a similar Tillamook County case involving a cow and an open gate: Watzig v Tobin, 292 Or 645 (1982) 50 Or App 539 (1981).”

The Facts of the case, as stated by Judge Peterson, are worth quoting:

It was after midnight. The plaintiff was driving north on highway 101 near Tillamook. She saw a cow on the side of the highway. She slowed, went around the animal, and as she did so she saw a second cow which she ran into. Both cows belonged to the defendants and had escaped from their farm.

There were three gates to the barnyard where the cows were confined. Two of the three gates were permanently secured with rope and wire, so securely that in order to open them "you just about had to have wire cutters." The third gate, through which cows had escaped in the past, had been equipped with a "cable clamp" device several months before the accident….”


And, on the Recent Pig Front:

Then there is this recent story from the ABA Journal Law News Now:
Pet Sitter Gets Probation in Cruelty Case Over Too-Fat Pig, posted Apr 14, 2009, by Martha Neil

Excerpt: “Agreeing with the owner of a potbellied pig that a pet sitter abused the animal by letting it go hog wild at mealtimes and in between, a judge in Minnesota has sentenced the sitter to one year of probation for animal cruelty….” (link to full article)

Apr 14, 2009

Pigs in Law and Literature

During a recent search for an old Oregon case* (at least we think it is an Oregon case - and even that it is old may be debatable), a colleague sent me a link to this news story about some feral pig legislation working its way through the Oregon Legislature: HB 2221 (PDF or HTML):

Man vs. pig like Ahab vs. Moby Dick, by MARK FREEMAN, Medford Mail Tribune, April 11, 2009:

Excerpt: “POWERS, Ore. — There's a big pig rooting its way around Jody Cyr's 400 acres of southern Coos County rangeland, and Cyr has spent the better part of the past three years doing his best to kill him.

The 32-year-old Cyr spends many off season hunting evenings tracking the feral swine, reaching into the vast array of hunting tricks allowed year-round for this non-native, unprotected animal.

"Spotlight it. Bait it. You name it, and I've tried it," Cyr says. "I really want to kill him."

Beginning next year, Cyr might be required by law to kill him, or perhaps become a criminal for failing to do so….”
(link to full story)

Oregon Legislation: HB 2221: “Creates crime of sale or purchase of hunts for feral swine. Punishes by maximum imprisonment of one year, $6,250 fine, or both, and revocation of hunting licenses, tags and permits for period of 24 months. Makes sale or purchase of hunts for feral swine violation punishable by $1,000 fine and revocation of hunting licenses, tags and permits for period of 24 months. Creates crime of knowingly allowing feral swine to roam on private land. Punishes by maximum imprisonment of one year, $6,250 fine, or both….”

And then there is P.G. Wodehouse’s famous sow, the Empress of Blandings, a true favorite.

There is an old (1950’s or 60’s) science fiction story, whose author or title I cannot remember, about the compatibility of pigs and humans when their organs are transplanted, from the former to the latter. The author may have been influenced by the 1896 H.G. Well’s Island of Dr. Moreau.

There is also a wonderful joke (I have a joke about almost everything!) about kosher “ham”, but I’ll save that for another time.

* Here is a description of the case that may or may not exist in Oregon: "A homeowner failed to fence in a pig that walked onto a highway. The police/sheriff responded to the scene and while responding got into a car crash with a civilian driver. The question for the court was proximate cause and liability. Was the police department liable for the crash or was the pig owner for not fencing in the pig?"

Apr 13, 2009

What if the Beneficiaries of Your Estate Get Divorced?

People seeking to divorce often don’t realize how entwined their lives have become, with each other and with the law. It’s hard enough to deal with finances (and the dreaded QDRO) and “telling the children,” but what do you do when the benefited children get their own divorces, and the will doesn’t specify what share, if any, the ex-spouse gets?

A recent article in the April 2009 issue of the OSB Estate Planning and Administration Section newsletter (previous issues of the newsletter are free online) addresses some of these issues and looks at some recent Oregon cases:

How to Avoid Unintended Consequences of Estate Planning in Dissolution Court,” by Lisa Bertalan and Melissa Lande.

Apr 8, 2009

License to Print Money? Researching Marijuana Taxation Law, History, and Practice

A recent bill in the Oregon Legislature, 2009 HB 3274 (HTML or PDF), and a question from a patron, started me thinking about what my research strategy might look like if I had to draft legislation on this subject or if I had to argue for or against taxing marijuana sales (medical marijuana or other uses, if any).

(There was also this recent New York Times story: Struggling States Look to Unorthodox Taxes, by Jesse McKinley, February 28, 2009.)

And, I attended an interesting program recently on evidence-based research (origins in evidence-based medicine), which gave me even more ideas on sources one would need to consult to write the definitive guide to marijuana research, or even just marijuana taxation.

But, I’m not trying to write that tome, and this blog post is quite long enough as it is, so I will post what I’ve come up with so far and leave the tomes, and full pathfinders, for another post or for someone who won't get bored with it by day 2.

We'll start with the bill. Here’s a summary of Oregon 2009 HB 3274:

Directs Department of Human Services to establish and operate marijuana production facility and distribute marijuana to pharmacies for dispensing to medical marijuana cardholders and designated primary caregivers. Allows pharmacists to dispense marijuana to medical marijuana cardholders and designated primary caregivers. Disallows private marijuana grow sites. Imposes tax of $98 per ounce on marijuana dispensed by pharmacies. Establishes Marijuana Production Facility Fund. Continuously appropriates moneys from fund to department for operation of production facility.” (link to full text of the bill)

As of today, here is the history (update from House Measure History):

3-11(H) First reading. Referred to Speaker's desk.
3-12 Referred to Business and Labor with subsequent referral to Revenue.
3-18 Public Hearing held


(Note: After the 3/18 hearing, news sources reported that the taxation issue is off the table.)

Onward to the heart of the matter: Prepare yourself for a legal research adventure (only a law librarian could love?)!:

In general, always start any legal research by checking to see someone has already done any of the work for you. This could mean different starting places for different types of questions. For this particular research project, you’ll first look to see if anyone has already written a research guide on the subject of marijuana taxation, and then you'll move on to building your own.

1) Check for law library guides and pathfinders on the subject: e.g. this one from Cal State, Fullerton. Google will be useful, but won’t reach the cracks and crevices of the deep or invisible web, so read on.

2) Legal periodical indexes: ILP and LRI (most academic law libraries subscribe to these databases and some large public law libraries do too). This is another way to find out if anyone has already researched and written on your topic. Note how far back in time the index goes. And marijuana taxation debates have been around for a long time. If your database goes back only to, e.g. 1985, you’ll need to keep time-traveling to reach full runs of periodicals.

3) HeinOnline has full runs of law journals (most academic law libraries subscribe to this database, and some public libraries do, though few with remote access, except for WCCLS, which does offer free, remote, public access for its library card holders).

4) Other subscription databases: including general newspaper and magazine indexes often available from public libraries (e.g. this gateway at WCCLS) and legal research databases (see this guide, for example). Marijuana taxation articles may show up not just in the legal literature, but also in the popular press, in medical journals, public policy ones, etc.

5) Check Congressional and other government documents indexes, databases, and journals, too, e.g. CQ, Congressional Index, etc. (Visit a Government Depository Library website to see what these resources might include, e.g. here or here or here).

6) Don’t forget CRS reports: Members of Congress have still not made this database of reports public, but librarians and researchers have been trying to make up for this. See, e.g. BoleyBlogs. You can Google for CRS reports too.

7) JSTOR : Most academic libraries have JSTOR access and so do some large public library systems, e.g. Multnomah County and Google Scholar will pick up documents in JSTOR.

8) Survey of State Laws (edited by Richard Leiter): always take 3 minutes to check to see if this book includes the subject you are researching. (Most academic law libraries will have this in print or subscribe to the database and some large public libraries and public law libraries will have this too.)

9) And then there is the “Subject Compilation of State Laws.” (Here’s a blog post from KCLL about it.) (Most academic law libraries will have this in print or subscribe to the database and some large public libraries and public law libraries will have this too.)

10) Dissertations: These used to be a LOT harder to check than they are now (so don’t complain), but it’s still rather laborious research. Here’s one guide to dissertation research, and another, and another.

11) Organizations and associations also publish research, though sometimes only at their own websites: Use Associations Unlimited (at most academic and large public libraries) to find organizations that might have published on the subject of taxation of marijuana.

Tired yet? Wait, there’s more! We haven’t even gotten to your own original research. In order to do that efficiently, if not quickly, try these steps:

12) Check for any alternate spellings, nicknames, or slang that you may not have found while searching the resources above. You can’t do a full search without using the right “keywords.” You can Google “marijuana slang” for more ideas than you could possibly need. But don’t forget you may need to try different forms of the word tax, taxation, taxes, levies, etc. Not all indexes or search engines have word truncation and wildcard options.

13) Research laws (bet you thought I’d never get to “the law”): States, Federal, uniform, model, foreign, international, histories, etc.: Visiting a law library may be the best way to find all these resources (and some guidance on how to search), but you can do some of this searching on your own online (see OLR blog sidebars for links to low-cost and free legal research databases). And, keep taking those good notes!

You will probably have to visit a law library to make sure you haven’t missed a database, especially if you aren’t a student or law school faculty member with easy access to all the databases. But you will also start looping back on your previous research, which can be sign you're covering everything, or a sign that you're not reaching out far enough.

14) Google, Google Books, Google Scholar, Google Blogs, Google News, Google Images, etc.

15) Don’t forget Dogpile or other search engines.

16) If you are a glutton for punishment or want to become a Super Searcher, start here, with Bates Information Service, for excellent monthly Tips and some more online search strategies.

17) I’ve left off some other important fields of research where you will find useful indexes and databases: medicine, social sciences, psychiatry, criminal justice, etc.

Who are "the people?" What does it mean to be “born in the U.S.A.”?

Who are “the people” the U.S. Constitution keeps referring to? (Notice how no one has taken up the Wiki Answer challenge to this question.)

This is not an uncommon question in public libraries, law libraries, and in government documents libraries (even after the 2008 election).

It’s also one of those questions to which we all know the answer (or think we do), but that is rather difficult to answer to anyone’s satisfaction because there isn’t a single legal pronouncement that will satisfy everyone.

The most frequent misunderstanding about "the people" is that one doesn't need to have been born in a "state" to be a U.S. citizen. One needs to have been born “in the United States."

You can start with this law, but there are other roads to follow: 20 CFR §416.1610 : How to prove you are a citizen or a national of the United States.

(a) … You can prove that you are a citizen or a national of the United States by giving us— …

d) What "United States" means. We use the term United States in this section to mean the 50 States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam, the Virgin Islands of the United States, American Samoa, Swain's Island, and the Northern Mariana Islands.

[47 FR 3106, Jan. 22, 1982, as amended at 62 FR 59813, Nov. 5, 1997]

From the CFR 416-1410, you can also visit this web site, at the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service, which I linked to it from here (and then follow the link through to "Citizenship of Children”).

Another reference is this one from the State Department.

You can also call your U.S. Senators or Representatives and ask them. It never hurts to remind them that you, The People (singular, not as in The People vs. The Defendant), vote - a corporation cannot, at least not the One Person, One Vote type of voting we all know and love.

See also the materials at the Library of Congress (which, you will note, is not called the Library of The People), here and here.

It is the simplist questions that stump us. Like the one from the person who asked "can someone sign away his constitutional rights?" Yes, and no. We then proceded to talk for 20 minutes and could have gone on for another 20, and another. But it was worth it.

Misappropriated Dongles?

When you read documents with phrases like this, “ISPI misappropriated the dongles,” is it any wonder that people want to return to darker ages (before computers and maybe even before electricity!) or want desperately to flee into the forest, or hide inside a beer, for a long while until the madness settles down?

I’ve been reading, in a rather desultory fashion I admit, news about the (not yet final and not the only digital book project on the planet (see Open Content Alliance story in NYT)) Google Settlement and drifted from the excellent Library Law blog to Rebecca Tushnet’s posts on the subject (which is where the dongle discussion came from).

What’s a person to do to keep up with it all? Not much. My recommendation is to keep up with the things you find interesting, the things you have to keep up with for your work and your families, and turn to the experts when you need a primer on something you’ve never heard before or just confuse you.

Wikipedia is a great place to begin to look for Answers, but no place to end.

Your public library is another place to begin - and continue, and if questions of law are involved, your public law library! Libraries are filled with print and online Primers, Encyclopedias, Handbooks, and the like.

Let you libraries be your extra set of eyes and ears. You can find on your own a lot of what you need, but libraries sometimes have some incomparable reference resources you didn’t know about and that might make you want to come back from endless wanderings in the forest.

Apr 6, 2009

Death, Taxes, Bar Exams, and Access to Justice in Oregon

The Feb/March 2009 issue of the Oregon State Bar (OSB) Bulletin has an interesting editorial by Oregon attorney John Gear: A Better Beginning:

There is no shortage of commentary on the life, death, and value of bar exams (including bar exam humor from Blawg Review), but that is as it should be.

Excerpt: “As a transplant attorney, still fairly new to Oregon, it is with some trepidation and thoughts of tilting at windmills that I write to propose fundamental changes to the state’s bar admission practices. However, after reading the December bar Bulletin, I find I must.

As Karen Garst’s "Breaking Barriers" farewell essay (December 2008) showed, awareness of the pointlessness of making attorneys retake the bar exam as a penalty for moving to Oregon is not limited to those who have to suffer the exercise. What is less appreciated is the full cost of this arbitrary and capricious requirement for attorneys, which even extends to the Multistate Professional Responsibility examination.

In the same issue of the magazine, "Hard Times for Access to Justice" provided another in an endless stream of articles and speeches by legal worthies bemoaning the tiny life raft of free or low-cost legal aid being swamped on the tsunami of demand. Meanwhile, each year, Oregon wastes a vast and valuable resource that could be helping many more low-income Oregonians get the legal help they need to deal with life’s struggles: transplant attorneys and new law grads who waste hundreds (and, often, thousands) of dollars and countless hours preparing for an examination that has no demonstrated relationship to competence, determination or likelihood of success as an attorney….”
(link to full editorial)

ORS, Mendeleev, Roget, Tufte, and You?

I blogged a little while ago about a new website for the Oregon Revised Statutes. In the old days (pre-Web old days) you needed serious money, organization, and infrastructure to set up a publishing business so even if you had a better mousetrap, or a statute compilation, you probably cooled your jets and went off to practice law instead of building your own database.

Welcome to the Zeros (i.e. 2000’s)! If you have an idea, you can run with it, or code with it (yes, "to code" is a verb), web it, blog it, or otherwise unleash your inner online publisher.

The ORS site mentioned above is courtesy of smart, creative, and public-service minded law students (universities and law school networks are behind many a nascent entrepreneurial enterprise).

Here is another one from lawyers: Naked Ownership: All Things Legal in Louisiana (and do read about how the site was named).

No one has yet topped Roget’s beautiful thesaurus (not to mention the Periodic Table), but many have tried (see, for example, Edward Tufte’s oeuvre) and we are better for it.

Blogging, Commitment, and Legal Cartoons

Blogging is a commitment - it’s not a civil (or criminal) commitment, although it sometimes may feel that way, but it’s still something to take seriously (and I also believe civilly), assuming you the blogger want to be taken seriously. You need to blog regularly to keep up the momentum, your own and your readers. (See my previous posts on blogging, here and on public sector blogging.)

But, it can't be as difficult as trying to trying to come up with a cartoon a day, which has to be up there with having to put out an interesting newspaper every day (with real articles, not just wire stories) or feeding a family 3 meals a day, day after day, week after week, month after …. You get the point, which may not be what you think it is.

Imagine, each and every single day, day after day, week after …, you are introduced to someone as the “funniest person I know,” and each time someone new looks at you as if to say, “ok, say something funny.” How many of us can meet that challenge?! Daily cartoonists do!

There are a lot of web lawyer cartoonists, bless their hearts, and one I've been following recently is Courtoons. It’s a law-cartoon so I get to blawg about it. It’s not sophisticated, the cartoonist is no great artist, but it will still tickle your funny bone, especially if you remember those gruesome law school years.

Don’t forget to visit Stu’s Views, too. And, for more, just Google the words: lawyer law cartoons comics. Lawyers have to get it out of their systems, too!

Apr 5, 2009

Legal Notices and Service by Publication in Oregon

Attorneys know about legal notices, service by publication, or other publication requirements, but what about us normal people?! What are we to do?

Here is a little guidance, but I also recommend you ask the judge (if it was a judge who told you to publish a legal notice) or consult an attorney. You want to get this right! It’s not cheap to publish a legal notice and it's even more expensive to get it wrong - because you have to do it all over again.

Legal notices may also called Legal Ads (not to be confused with Legal Aids!). I wrote a blog post last May about Legal Notice by Publication, but the question pops up now and again, and again, and again.

And recently, I found this, Public Notice Ads dot com while reading Inter Alia’s useful and fun Internet Legal Research Weekly service.

Apr 1, 2009

“Are you a licensed Oregon attorney?” is a Yes or No Question

Check Your “Attorney’s” Bona Fides! (Don't be an April Fool.)

“I thought he was a licensed attorney.”
“I thought a paralegal could advise and represent me.”
“He said he knew Oregon law.”

If you hire someone who claims to be an attorney, or who hedges when asked, trust your instincts, because when your instinct detects hedging, your instinct is often a whole lot sharper than you are at the moment. It doesn’t mean it is right, just that it isn’t bothered with “being nice” or any other need to please. Be the adult and stay in charge of the situation.

Are you a licensed attorney in this state” is a yes or no question.

The answer should not be "uh, huh, or uhhhhhhh,” or, “ummm, uh uh, how are you today?” or “sort of,” or any variation on that theme.

The answer should either be "NO" or “YES" and "here is my bar card so you can check with the Oregon State Bar.” And then CHECK with the Oregon State Bar! Call them or check their website, for heaven’s sake.

See this case, MBNA v. Garcia, Oregon Court of Appeals, April 1, 2009

Excerpt: “… Acting on a recommendation from his former wife, defendant "retained" a man named Barlow to represent him, believing Barlow to be a licensed attorney. Barlow was not licensed to practice law. Apparently, he advised defendant that defendant could favorably resolve the collection matter by demanding that plaintiff submit the claim to an arbitrator, Alta Arbitration Associates, working out of Billings, Montana, which would invoke certain obscure legal theories to invalidate the debt. Defendant followed that advice. Alta Arbitration Associates, which apparently relied on theories it obtained on the Internet, was not one of the fora approved in the agreement between the parties. Plaintiff refused to participate. Alta Arbitration Associates then rendered a "judgment" in defendant's favor and bestowed on him an "award" of $62,765.46 plus interest and costs. When defendant, still "represented" by Barlow, attempted to enforce the "judgment" from Alta Arbitration Associates in federal court, the court twice dismissed the complaint….” (read full case)

Need to find an attorney? Read this blog post.

Need to find an attorney who practices law in another state? Check with that state’s attorney licensing body: A Compilation of State Lawyer Licensing Databases, by Andrew Zimmerman and Trevor Rosen, Published on January 19, 2009

Can you Copyright a Tweet?

No, this is not a Twick or Tweet April 1st post…:

It was only a matter of time before someone would ask if a Tweet could be copyrighted. I’ll let the lawyers discuss this, but for now this is only a matter of First Impression. I’m sure more discussion will ensue.

Thanks to Ernie the Attorney for the first link, which took me to the Tweet copyright post.

Justice Bedsworth Tackles Bovid Jurisprudence

Justice Bedsworth is no Edward Albee (and we’re glad of that), but both can have you scratching your head(s) for reasons that become clear this month with the Justice’s column:

Poof, The Magic Goat Man: “This is what we get when the governor appoints an English major.” by Justice William W. Bedsworth

You can visit California Court of Appeal Associate Justice William Bedsworth monthly at his A Criminal Waste of Space column.

(Previous links to A Criminal Waste of Space, and archives, are here.)