Jul 29, 2010

More on “What’s a Valid Signature” on an Oregon Initiative Petition

In my previous post, What is a “Valid Signature” on an Oregon Initiative Petition?, I linked to a document titled, APPENDIX 1 (165-014-0030): Sampling to validate state petitions. It’s a doozy of a document so you might want to take a look at it.

It’s not as painful or as long as the Wikileaks documents, but still, you might want to make some coffee and take a comfortable seat before proceeding.

It begins, auspiciously, as follows, which is reminder to keep your kids in school as long as possible and make sure they take plenty of math and statistics classes. And for anyone who thinks a “civil service” job is a walk in the park, that is not always the case. Someone(s) had to write this guideline/directive:

"... For describing the verification methods, it is convenient to list some general notation for counts from a petition and sample.

Petition:
N = number of signatures submitted (petition size)
M = number of distinct valid signatures (number of electors that submit valid signatures)
Y = number of valid signatures
D = number of duplicates of valid signatures
R = required number of distinct valid signatures Sample:
n = number of signatures selected in sample (sample size)
y = number of valid signatures in sample
2 e = number of electors with two valid signatures in sample
3 e = number of electors with three valid signatures in sample...."


It gets worse (and I don't have mathematical notation, so bear with me here and look at the original). Keep in mind that we are barely into page 2 of an 11 page description of the mathematics of sampling. Go ahead, live dangerously, and read it.

"In general, ek , will represent the number of electors with k (k =1,2,3,4,L) valid signatures in the sample.

The total number of distinct valid signatures in the petition is given by M = Y − D , (Equation 1) where the subtraction eliminates the duplicates of valid signatures. A statistical estimate for the number of distinct valid signatures can be obtained by substituting estimates for the numbers of valid signatures and duplicates of valid signatures in Equation 1. The task is to determine, from statistical estimates, whether the total number of distinct valid signatures in the petition attains the required number, M ≥ R..."
(Link to full document.)

FOR MUCH MORE FUN:

Ballotpedia is doing an almost thankless job (but we thank them!) of keeping track of ballot initiatives in Oregon and beyond, so pay them a visit. And don’t miss their Signature Recovery Lawsuit pages. Whew. That’s a lot of tracking and writing they are doing.

Awesome Bus Stops around the World

As a public transit rider (3+ hours/day, yet – yeesh), I loved these, so forgive the digression from legal research topics, though I do write a fair number of traffic law posts.

Awesome Bus Stops Around the World

Thank you to The Mighell Marker: A Legal Technology Weekly, for the excellent tip! To subscribe, just visit Inter-Alia and sign up -- it's free!

Zimmerman’s Legal Research Guide

If you haven’t heard or used Zimmerman’s Legal Research guide, give it a whirl. You might find you use it again and again.

Andy Zimmerman has now created a handy-dandy ZRG blog, which is an excellent way to keep atop his updates to the ZRG.

Recent updates include these, but you can find them all, including an RSS feed, from the ZRG blog homepage:

1) Researching Nonprofit Corporation Laws, July 22, 2010
2) Circulation Information for Newspapers and Magazines, July 20, 2010

Jul 28, 2010

Group Purchasing for Small Law Firms (with a side of dark humor)

Solo and small law firm practitioners, like small libraries, have a tough time achieving certain purchasing economies of scale. Bar associations offer some group discounts, but not always for what solo and small law firm practitioners need. Sometimes you need the strength, and heft, of bulk-buying behind you:

Bob Ambrogi’s (hompage) LawSites had a post on a couple of group purchasing options for law firms. (He also writes a monthly column in the Oregon State Bar (OSB) Bulletin.)

Another Site Offers Group Buying for Small Firms, July 26, 2010

And for a darkly humorous story on “legal” bulk-buying and effective selling:

National Center for State Courts (NCSC) report: “Future Trends in State Courts 2010,” page 191:

Denise Kyman Doran—Kabul, Afghanistan: …. "Denise also recounts that what might have seemed a small accomplishment was actually significant. For example the courts’ filing system was very poor quality. Denise wrote a grant to USAID, which turned it over to the Defense Department for funding. The project went out to bid, and staff found a local metalworker who would build cabinets. “On the day we delivered the cabinets to the Supreme Court a representative from the Department of Defense remarked the next time a bomb goes off ‘I know where to take cover.’ The metalworker used this remark to sell his cabinets to other government departments and ministries, which increased his business tenfold." ...’ (Link to full NCSC report directly, from the NCSC website, or from the Law Librarian Blog.)

MUTCD: Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices

MUTCD: Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices

Another research resource alive and well on the web, but remember, not everyone has web access. The digital divide is also alive and well. Support your libraries that make digital documents available to people who don't have easy access to online resources!

Oregon Lawyers on Speaking to “The Media”

Many lawyers, law professors, and judges have to talk to the press (print and online news writers and reporters) at some time in their careers. Sometimes reporters just want some background information, facts checked, or some legal procedural step clarified. But sometimes, the lawyer IS the story, or at least the only story the news-writer has access to.

What do you do and say if your client is a party to a news-worthy case? More to the point, what do you say if you’re a new lawyer and you’ve not yet been battle scarred by badly written, inaccurate, misspelled, and potentially harmful (to your client) news stories?

Aside from the fact that “the press” can be your friend and that we all like to READ news stories, what are some of those tried and true lessons our parents would have taught us if they held high-profile legal jobs:

1) First and foremost, for Oregon attorneys: Please speak to the OSB PLF for any advice they can provide, which can be a lot. (Law librarians refer lawyers to their PLF all the time – we love the PLF! Well, it’s law librarian-love, but that’s not such a bad thing, is it?)

2) Second: Talk to media-savvy colleagues for their stories and advice.

3) Third: Find a quiet moment and do some reading. These are just a few titles available from the ABA (and possibly your local law library). Other publishers have additional titles.

a) Free Press and the Illusion of Prejudice, by Thomas B. Kelley, ABA 2003

b) In the Court of Public Opinion: Winning Strategies for Litigation Communications, 2nd ed., by James F. Haggerty, ABA 2009

c) Lawyers and Reporters, by Robert L. Rothman, ABA 2000

d) Prosecuting and Defending Popular Public Figures, by Daniel Small, ABA 2003

e) Public Relations for Lawyers, by Elizabeth Lampert, Richard S. Levick, ABA 2004

f) Talking to the Press and Making Them Listen, by Skyler Bentsen and Daniel Scardino, ABA 2005

4) A few years ago (March 10, 2004, to be exact) the Washington County Bar Association held a CLE entitled: “What to do when the media up. Run? Hide? Or Grab the Mic! A look at the OregonPress/Broadcaster/Bar Guidelines, Reporters Shield Law and Access to Courts.” (Print copy available at the Washington County Law Library.)

5) “Making News: Talking with the Media,” by Mark J. Fucile, OSB Bulletin, July 2010, pp. 34-35

Oregon Tattoo Artist Licensing Update

Willamette Week, July 21, 2010, story: The Skin Game: Unlicensed tattooing is on the rise—with bad consequences” about the Oregon Health Licensing Agency (OHLA) and tattoo artists:

Excerpt: “It takes more than dyed hair, gauged ears and a wardrobe inspired by Kat Von D to become a tattoo artist in Oregon.

Hundreds of hours and dollars can go into getting a tattoo license from the
Oregon Health Licensing Agency—legally required by the state since 1993.

But many have decided to forgo the testing and training that’s necessary to prevent staph infections, blood poisoning or worse for customers. A recent case marks the first time anyone has been charged in Oregon with the misdemeanor of tattooing without a license, says Kraig Bohot, a spokesman for the health licensing agency.

The charges in Coos County are in connection with the Feb. 5 death of 17-year-old ....“
(Link to full post.)

Oregon Legal Research blog previous post on Oregon tattoo artists: Tattoos: The Art, Craft, Business, and Oregon Law of Tattoos and Tattoo Artists

Error in the Court Report: Legal Publishing

A Law Librarian Blog July 27, 2010, post was interesting on several counts:

It May Be Just One Letter But … When West Refuses to Correct Scopes v. Tennessee Because of “Cost,” I Think We Have a Problem

1) Yes, the writer is correct. The error should be corrected.

2) Yes, the first Comment writer is also correct, as anyone with a long, detailed To Do List knows. We all have to rank those items in order of priority, but I refuse to throw the first stone at someone who has ordered their top priority items differently from how I would order them.

3) Yes, many non-attorneys and non-law librarians aren’t aware how many errors exist in official sources, let alone in unofficial sources of statutes, cases, and other primary sources of laws.

The lesson I would recommend you take here is to use this case (or blog post) as a “teachable moment” example (and there are many other examples of publication errors out there, from 1066 to the present if you want to include the last 1,000 years of Anglo-American law).

Oregon State Bar (OSB) Public Website Update

The Oregon State Bar public website has a great new look. There is a lot of information in print and on video.

The Legal Links cable TV shows are terrific and worth watching if you need information about landlord-tenant law, DUII, Small Claims Court, and many more. If you don’t have a computer, please visit your public library or public law library. Many, most, libraries have computers and headphones you can use to listen to these OSB programs.

Jul 26, 2010

Oregon November 2010 Election: REGISTER TO VOTE (and Gubernators)

Brace yourself for a fun Oregon Election ballot in November 2010.

If you want to participate, don’t forget to register to vote. Visit the Oregon Secretary of State Election Division or your county election office for information on registering online or in person.

November 2010 is the time to vote for a new Oregon Gubernator. (Why else would they call it a gubernatorial election?)

Oregon Political Parties and Gubernatorial Candidates so far:

1) Constitution: Greg Kord
2) Democrat: John Kitzhaber (and Wikipedia and Facebook pages)
3) Independent: Richard Esterman (and Facebook)
4) Libertarian: Wes Wagner (also Wikipedia)
5) Pacific Green Party (no candidate?)
6) Progressive Party (also Wikipedia) (no candidate?)
7) Republican: Chris Dudley (and Wikipedia and Facebook pages)
8) Working Families Party (also Wikipedia and Facebook) (no candidate?)

In addition to that Gubernator (aka Governor), you will have lots of other decisions to make, including a U.S. Senate seat and U.S. House of Representatives seats to fill. For updates on statewide measures, visit candidate websites, read the news (paper and digital), and attend local events where candidates are speaking.

Local: Check your county election office and website for updates. (You can also visit the Oregon Legislature's webpage, Find Your Legislator, to identify your state and federal representatives.)

MORE ELECTION FUN: Ballot Measures, oh boy:

Local newspapers and websites have been running stories about upcoming ballot measures and profiling candidates for local and statewide office.

You can also check the searchable database at the Secretary of State’s office. It’s not entirely intuitive, but not bad as these databases go so play around with it and you’ll figure it out. I have phoned their office in moments of frustration and staff members were very helpful.

City and County measures and local officials will be on the ballot. For example, in Multnomah County, you’ll see a full election ballot, including ones on county officeholder term limits, Salary commission, Vacancy in office, Election to fill vacancies, library tax district, and officeholder right to hold and run (i.e. hold onto current office while running for another position).

Other Oregon election websites to explore:
1) Politics1 (Oregon)
2) Green Papers 2010. (The Oregon 2009 and 2008 Green Papers and the Green Papers homepage.)
3) Wikipedia Oregon Gubernatorial 2010 Election
4) If you are so inclined, take a look at these political party bylaws.
5) Don't forget to visit Ballotpedia if you're a real election wonk! (Ballotpedia, Oregon)


Previous Oregon Legal Research blog posts on elections.

Oregon State Bar Public Website

The Oregon State Bar public website has a great new look. There is a lot of information online and on video.

The Legal Links cable TV shows are terrific and worth watching if you need information about landlord-tenant law, DUII, Small Claims Court, and much, much more. If you don’t have a computer, please visit your public library or public law library. Many, most, of us have computers and headphones you can use to listen to these OSB programs.

Jul 25, 2010

Exotic Pets in Oregon and Beyond. Book: "Forbidden Creatures"

While on a rare, and all too brief, break from work, I caught, so to speak, a wonderful, and not a little bit terrifying, interview on Fresh Air with Peter Laufer, author of "Forbidden Creatures: Inside the World of Animal Smuggling and Exotic Pets.”

It was hard on the heels of my Exotic Pets post: Animal Law: Thou Shall Not Covet Exotic Pets in Oregon (and beyond)

Oregon Liquor Control Commission (OLCC) and Home-Brewers

If you’ve been reading stories about the Oregon Liquor Control Commission (OLCC) ban on sharing home-brewed beer (and the Oregon Homebrewers Alliance has links and information), you might want to read the law itself and a bit more on how this all came about.

1) The OLCC Blog has information and you can visit their other news sites as well.

2) The Willamette Week has information and a link to the July 23, 2010, OLCC press release.

3) The Portland Mercury has cites to laws and advocacy groups in their July 15, 2010, article and follow-up: "Beerly Legal: Serving Homebrew in Public Is Illegal. Who Knew?" by Stefan Kamph. It helps your cause when a legislator who knows how to the shepard legislation through the system is himself an award-winning homebrewer:

Excerpt: “…"There needs to be a much broader exemption," says Oregon State Senator Floyd Prozanski from Eugene, whose Captain Nimrod Nut Brown Ale homebrew has won awards. "Currently, if you bring a homebrewed six pack to your friend's house for dinner, that's illegal."

Prozanski says that the law could be revised in 2011….”


4) According to this post at OPB, even OLCC is looking to make a change in the law.

Excerpt: ‘OLCC Looks To Change Statute On Home Brewing, by Alex Lewis, July 23, 2010:

… Christie Scott is with the OLCC. She says the agency is already working to get the law changed.

Christie Scott: "It's just makes common sense to get it changed. The homebrewers haven't been a public safety issue for us. So there's no reason for us to advocate against getting this law changed."
’ (Link to full post.)

5) The ORS statute cited is this one: 2009 ORS 471.403 (or from the ORS homepage if the direct link isn’t working), which reads:

2009 ORS 471.403 License required to produce alcoholic liquor; exception.

(1) No person shall brew, ferment, distill, blend or rectify any alcoholic liquor unless licensed so to do by the
Oregon Liquor Control Commission. However, the Liquor Control Act does not apply to the making or keeping of naturally fermented wines and fruit juices or beer in the home, for home consumption and not for sale.

(2) Notwithstanding subsection (1) of this section, the holder of a brewery-public house license or a brewery license may allow patrons to brew malt beverages not to exceed 14 percent alcoholic content by volume if the brewing is conducted under the direct supervision of the licensee or employees of the licensee. Malt beverages produced under this subsection may not be sold by the patron or consumed on the licensed premises.

(3) Notwithstanding subsection (1) of this section, the holder of a winery license may allow patrons to make wine if the winemaking is conducted under the direct supervision of the licensee or employees of the licensee. Wine produced under this subsection may not be sold by the patron or consumed on the licensed premises. [Formerly 471.205; 2007 c.414 §1]

Jul 23, 2010

Oregon Small Claims and Traffic Court: A Free CLE, July 29, 2010

If you’re interested in learning more about how Oregon Small Claims and Traffic courts operate, here’s your chance:

Oregon Small Claims and Traffic CLE

Presented by: Judge Steven A. Todd, Multnomah County Circuit Court

Portland State University’s Student Legal Services Office is hosting a Small Claims and Traffic CLE this summer on July 29th, 2010. The CLE will be free of charge and open to the public. To register please visit our website. For more information please call 503.725.4556.

When: July 29th, 2010, 2:00pm-4:30pm
Where: Smith Memorial Student Union Room 338, PSU
Cost: Free of charge
Credit: 2 General MCLE Credits (pending)

Please contact Student Legal Services at 503.725.4556 with any questions.

Jul 21, 2010

What is a “Valid Signature” on an Oregon Initiative Petition?

Questions about Oregon initiative and referendum signature petitions are as old as the petition itself (1902) and as new as yesterday (see History links, below). The latest challenges are to the Secretary of State's office tossing petition signatures for a 2010 ballot initiative that would change how the state manages legislative redistricting.

There are lots of recent news stories; online news readers can Google (or otherwise search) “oregon initiative petition signatures” with any variations you wish that develop as you read the stories. Don’t forget that the phrase “valid signature” may not be used in a story about petitioner signatures and instead, there may be words like signature verification, authentication, and similar words used in conjunction with the words petitions, signatures, and initiatives.

Keep in mind also that I know little about signature petitions (see Disclaimer, below), let alone the initiative and referendum process (other than as a voter), so come along on my:

“What I learned today about Initiative Petition Signature Validation" research adventure:

I’ll not be spoon feeding you. This is not a subject for those who can handle only spoon feeding. It’s for the hardy, the adventurous, the courageous, and for those who are willing to go boldly where ordinary mortals fear to tread, that is, reading The Law.

If you are the sort who only Consumes information, and who doesn’t participate in its Creation or its Analysis, you can move on to other blogs where people tell you things that may or may not be correct or may not apply to your situation or may oversimplify or just SHOUT OUT THEIR OPINIONS.

There are few opinions here; just research suggestions.

Onward:

QUESTION: What is a “Valid Signature” on an Oregon Initiative Petition?

Even an amazing legal researcher might have a tough time figuring out what a “valid signature” is. I’m not amazing, but I do know a few things about legal research so decided to jump in since the question has been asked.

You can find some generic definitions of “valid signatures” by searching “the Internet” (e.g. Ballotpedia Valid Signatures), but for legally persuasive (and authoritative) information, you need to search the Oregon Constitution, the Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS), the Oregon Administrative Rules (OAR), the Oregon Secretary of State Elections Division website, and maybe even read some caselaw. You may still need to make a phone call or two depending on the context of your specific question.

There are also a lot of advocacy groups that may need to weigh in on this issue and related questions. Contact those you work or volunteer with or those to which you belong or trust.

Caveat: There is fair amount of easy to find information on Signature Gatherer (or Collector) requirements (see also Ballotpedia on Oregon Signature Requirements), but not a whole lot on exactly how the Secretary of State’s Office verifies signatures or on whether or not those procedures are in compliance with Oregon law. So don’t confuse the two questions.

You can read the “State Referendum Petition Process: Verification of Signatures (ORS 250.105 and OAR 165-014-0030)” at the Secretary of State Office (or type “valid signature” into the SoS Election Division search box), but it still leaves one with many questions.

To answer those, you’ll need to do the research (assuming you don’t know an expert in Oregon initiative law and even that person might have to do some research).

I.) Oregon Constitution
You can search the Index to the Constitution, under “Initiative & Referendum” to find this list:

INITIATIVE AND REFERENDUM
(Generally), Art. IV §1
Bond election suffrage restrictions, Art. II §2
Constitutional amendments, revisions, Art. IV §1,
Art. XVII §1, §2
County home rule, Art. VI §10
District legislation, Art. IV §1
Effective date of measure, Art. IV §1
Local and municipal legislation, Art. IV §1
Metropolitan service districts, Art. XI §14
Municipal mergers, Art. XI §2a
Part of Act, referendum, Art. IV §1
Petitions (Generally), Art. IV §1
County home rule, Art. VI §10
Signature gatherers, payment, Art. IV §1b
Recall section, effect, Art. II §18
Sentences, initiative or referendum measures, reduction by legislature, Art. IV §33
Single subject, constitutional amendments, Art. IV §1
Supermajority vote, measures stipulating, supermajority required to adopt, Art. II §23
Taxation, Art. II §2, Art. IX §1, §1a
Veto excluded, Art. IV §1

II.) Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) (but don’t forget that Special Session laws aren't codified until sometime after the regular session ORS codification has been printed - this matters only if there were new I&R laws enacted during a Special Session):

A) Use the General Index to get you to, among others, Chapters 250 and 260. (You can also look up “Signatures” or go right to the subject heading “Initiative and Referendum.”)

B) Look at the Table of Contents pages for those chapters, e.g. Ch. 250 and Ch. 260 and start reading.

Next, you’ll need to look at the:

III.) Oregon Secretary of State Elections Division website

A) Oregon Administrative Rules (OAR), generally, and Elections Division, specifically (Chapter 165). You can also find Elections Division Statutes and OARs from the Elections Division website.

B) State Initiative and Referendum Manual is another place to begin.

C) Don’t forget to look at: APPENDIX 1 (165-014-0030): Sampling to validate state petitions (It’s a lot of fun to read if you like math, but it still doesn’t answer the question: What is a Valid Signature? Or, maybe I’m just being cranky.)

Moving along:

IV.) Oregon Cases

A) Last, or first, or wherever, you’ll need to look at Oregon case law on the subject of petition signatures. You can use the print Thomson-Reuters Oregon Digest (see also bibliographic info at the Open Library), which you’ll find in any Oregon law library, or you can use an online legal research database (e.g. Casemaker, Fastcase, Lexis, LoisLaw, Westlaw, etc.)

B) You will need that database or that Oregon Digest. You cannot do thorough case law research “on the web” using a general search engine. You will need a database that is full-text, indexed, and preferably comprehensive with Oregon case law back to 1902.

Whew. Congratulations for making it this far! There’s more, but I have other law library work to do, including answering a question about the Home Brewers. We’ll continue the I & R “What I learned Today” discussion another time.

V.) HISTORY OF OREGON'S I & R:

A little history of Oregon Initiative & Referendum (I&R) may appeal to you:

1) Oregon Blue Book: Oregon Elections Process and History

2) Ballotpedia: History of Initiative & Referendum in Oregon

3) Googleoregon initiative history” for a fair smattering of articles. (You can limit your search to recent ones by clicking on the “More Search Tools” link from your results screen.)

4) There are also law review articles and books about Oregon’s I&R process, including but not limited to this book: "Adoption politics: Bastard Nation and ballot initiative 58," by E. Wayne Carp, Lawrence, Kan., University Press of Kansas, c2004.

5) Your local public library probably has a lot of material in its collection on Oregon I&R process.

Previous OLR blog posts on Oregon elections and codification.

DISCLAIMER:
The information provided on this blog is for research purposes only. We do not provide legal advice, nor do we endorse any person, product, or company.

Disclaimer: It is against state law for library staff members to engage in any conduct that might constitute the unauthorized practice of law (ORS 9.160, 9.166 and 9.21). They may not interpret statutes, cases or regulations, perform legal research, recommend or assist in the preparation of forms, or advise patrons regarding their legal rights. They may, however, assist patrons in locating materials or links that would aid in individual research.

Jul 20, 2010

Oregon November 2010 Election: Gubernator (aka Governor) Candidates!

Brace yourself for a fun ballot in November.

If you want to participate, don’t forget to register to vote. Visit the Oregon Secretary of State Election Division or your county election office for information on registering online or in person.

November 2010 is the time to vote for a new Oregon Gubernator! (Why else would they call it a gubernatorial election?)

Oregon Gubernatorial Candidates (or party websites) I have found so far:

1) Constitution: Greg Kord
2) Democrat: John Kitzhaber (and Wikipedia and Facebook pages)
3) Independent: Richard Esterman (and Facebook)
4) Libertarian: Wes Wagner (also Wikipedia)
5) Pacific Green Party (no candidate?)
6) Progressive Party (also Wikipedia) (no candidate?)
7) Republican: Chris Dudley (and Wikipedia and Facebook pages)
8) Working Families Party (also Wikipedia and Facebook) (no candidate?)

REPEAT: Don’t forget to register to vote. Visit the Oregon Secretary of State Election Division or your county election office for information on registering online or in person.

Local newspapers and websites have been running stories about upcoming ballot measures and profiling candidates for local and statewide office.

In addition to that Gubernator (aka Governor), you will have lots of other decisions to make, including a U.S. Senate seat and U.S. House of Representatives seats to fill. For updates on statewide measures, visit candidate websites, read the news (paper and digital), and attend local events where candidates are speaking.

Local: Check your county election office and website for updates:

City and County measures and local officials will also be on the ballot. For example, in Multnomah County, you’ll see a full election ballot, including ones on county officeholder term limits, Salary commission, Vacancy in office, Election to fill vacancies, library tax district, and officeholder right to hold and run (i.e. hold onto current office while running for another position).

Other Oregon election websites to explore:
1) Politics1 (Oregon)
2) Green Papers 2010. (The Oregon 2009 and 2008 Green Papers and the Green Papers homepage.)
3) Wikipedia Oregon Gubernatorial 2010 Election
4) If you are so inclined, take a look at these political party bylaws.


Previous Oregon Legal Research blog posts on elections.

Jul 18, 2010

Law Librarian (and law library) Jobs in Oregon

There are a number of Law Librarian position openings in Oregon this summer 2010. Visit the usual suspects for librarian job postings, but don’t forget the Oregon State Library Jobline.

The positions include an Assistant Law Librarian position in my own law library. You can link to a description and an application at the Washington County (Oregon) HR website.

The usual suspects for librarians seeking jobs include, but are not limited to state, regional, and local librarian listserves, professional associations such as AALL and SLA and ALA, PNLA, and LISJobs.

Jul 16, 2010

Oregon Estate Law: Wills and Trusts: Forms and “Self-Help” Advice

This is an update to previous posts on estate planning (and on pro se litigants):

Public law libraries, and public libraries generally, get a lot of questions from people (non-attorneys) who want to write their own wills, draft their own powers of attorney, and who want fill-in-the-blank estate planning legal forms.

1) If you have no money, no property, no children or relatives in Oregon or any other state, no heirs, no interest in leaving what you do have to a charity or nonprofit, and don’t care if what remains of your estate (everything) goes to the tax collector and/or the state general fund, you don’t have to read on.

2) If you have any, some, or all of those, money, children, heirs, beneficiaries, etc., please read on:

a) Yes, you can write your own will. Yes, you can write a darn good one and one that says what you want it to say and is enforceable, assuming you do the research. (And even then, I'd still have an Oregon attorney who specializes in estate planning look it over.)

b) However, if you are one of the (tens of) thousands who walk into libraries or bookstores with only questions about wills, but with no paper, pencil, or time to do the research, then my advice to you is:

Please consult an attorney!

3) Do plan to hire an attorney if you have children, property, siblings, a spouse (current, former, and/or domestic partner), a bank account, a retirement account, investments, or any interest in leaving part or all of your estate to a dependent, an heir, a friend, a charity, someone in another state, etc.

4) There is a difference between DIY legal research and DIY lawyering. When it comes to writing a will, keep in mind that you won’t be around to fix anything if the documents aren’t prepared properly and you will hurt only the people you love the most if you get it wrong.

5) Yes, you can do a lot of the preparation yourself – and I highly recommend you do so! It will save you time and money when you do consult an attorney.

6) If you plan to prepare your own documents and consult afterward with an Oregon attorney to review them, be prepared for some serious research. You will need to visit a Law Library. IT’S NOT ALL ONLINE. Few Oregon legal forms (mostly samples, not official) are available online. They are available in legal treatises, periodicals, course books, and from subscription databases.

7) If you plan to hire an attorney to prepare your will and related estate documents, please don’t spend a lot of filling out forms you find online or in a book. Self-help materials are an excellent way to learn about the documents you will need and the decisions you will need to make. They will also prepare you for questions your attorney may ask.

8) DO spend time gathering the documentation you need. Most attorneys have their own forms and if you’ve seen them the way I’ve seen them gnashing their teeth while trying to convert “self-help” forms to law office forms, you’ll heed my advice. That teeth-gnashing costs you, the client, money and sometimes a lot of it. That first consultation with your attorney will tell you what the process will cost and what documentation and information will be needed to draft your will (and related documents).


Disclaimer: It is against state law for library staff members to engage in any conduct that might constitute the unauthorized practice of law (ORS 9.160 to 9.166). They may not interpret statutes, cases or regulations, perform legal research, recommend or assist in the preparation of forms, or advise patrons regarding their legal rights. They may, however, assist patrons in locating materials or links that would aid in individual research.

We recommend you check with an attorney. The Oregon State Bar Information and Referral Service has a toll free number to call to get names of attorneys in your area; call their referral service at 503-684-3763 or 1-800-452-7636.

Jul 13, 2010

Oregon Estate Law: Basic Forms and Practice Materials

While there are dozens of print resources (and even more online) on specific wills, trusts, and estate planning issues and questions, here’s a short list of the basic, not to be skipped, Oregon estate planning forms and practice materials. These are print-only resources in most law libraries, though some libraries may have on-site online or CD-ROM access.

1) Oregon State Bar (OSB) estate planning practice and course books

2) Oregon Will and Trust Forms in the U.S. Bank 3-volume set (also on CD-ROM)

3) Vollmer, Valerie: Estate and Trust Forms, found in OSB CLE course books. Our latest set of the "Vollmer" forms is dated "Revised April 2007" (from a Nov 3, 2006, CLE) and they update the ones in the Dec 5, 2002, OSB CLE "Planning the Basic Estate." These are further updated in subsequent CLE course materials.

(This post is about Oregon estate planning forms only (and the general rule about "legal forms" applies). There are many, many non state-specific and self-help estate planning resources.)

Jul 11, 2010

DIY Legal Research vs. DIY Lawyering

I’m an energetic advocate of DIY Legal Research (as are most public law library librarians) and a somewhat less than enthusiastic advocate of DIY Lawyering (aka self-help, self-representation, pro se litigation, pro per representation), especially for people who don’t have any research experience or aptitude for hours of study, note-taking, writing, preparation, decision-making, and the sense to consult experts when necessary (not to mention having the patience of a cat watching its prey).

I've learned over the years that the most successful self-help litigant isn't necessarily the smartest person, though "smart" can help. But persistence, attention to detail, listening, patience, and good manners can often win out over "smart."

Our best pro se litigants consult attorneys. The litigants save money by thorough research, study, observation, taking chances and making mistakes, and not a small amount of luck. They also have lots of energy that is used staying up late drafting motions, answers, letters, and reading the law, in all its procedural and substantive glory.

DIY Legal Research is hard enough; DIY lawyering, especially in Oregon, is beyond the reach of most people for many types of legal problems and situations, especially those that will have a serious impact on your future or you family’s future (and the two are usually intertwined).

If you’re going to be your own lawyer, you need to know how to find the law, substantive and procedural, how to update it, how to interpret it, how to present it to the court, and what to do if things don’t go your way, e.g. dismissals, appeals, etc. Please don’t confuse equity with law, justice with courts, or statutes with legal rights.

As I’ve said many, many times, if you read only what is written in the statutes, the cases, and the constitutions you will be absolutely wrong about what the law is.

There is also a lot of “online" lawyering taking place "on the Internet” and in Google-land and it makes me very nervous, especially when I listen to judges and lawyers talk about having to throw out cases or fix them (at great expense).

There is Rocket Lawyer, LegalZoom, and many others. Please remember, if it’s too good to be true, if someone wants money up front, if you can’t check on the attorney’s bona fides (or even know if someone IS an attorney), then slow down. Contact the Oregon State Bar to check an attorney’s membership, call the Oregon Attorney General to find out if there are any consumer complaints, or ongoing investigations, against an online legal service, and in short, use your common sense before putting your legal problem and personal information in someone else’s hands.

Jul 9, 2010

Indexes: How to Save Time When Researching Legal or Criminal Justice Subjects

Whether you’re researching juvenile sex offender laws or marijuana taxation or jails or something in between, you will want to use an Index, that is, “indexes to periodical literature,” including magazine, journal, newsletter, and other print and online specialty or general publications indexes.

Indexes save you time, lots of time, and enable to you to locate articles you might otherwise miss if you search only full-text resources or simply “Google” a subject.

Most of the following indexes are online, but none is free online, although one or more may be “free” to institutional members, e.g. public library cardholders, educational institution students, staff, and faculty, and professional associations, to name a few groups that offer no-charge online index and other database and literature searching to their members.

This is not a complete list! There are hundreds, maybe even thousands, of indexes to legal and non-legal literature (and I use the word “literature” broadly, i.e. meaning pretty much “the written word” though there are also indexes to images, but that’s another topic).

General Legal Indexes:

1) W Wilson Indexes to Legal Periodical Literature (ILP)
2) Gale Group Legal Resource Index (LRI) (aka Legal Trac)
3) Index to Foreign Legal Periodicals


Criminal Justice and Social Science Indexes and Abstracts:

Universities with criminal justice programs provide excellent criminal justice research guides, often available from their library websites. Look for Indexes, Abstracts, Periodicals, Journals, and related headings to link you to the indexes you need. Here are some guides we like:

1) Rutgers University Libraries Criminal Justice research guide
2) Georgetown Law Library Criminal Law and Criminal Justice research guide
3) College of Criminology and Criminal Justice

There are also these free resources:

1) NCJRS (National Criminal Justice Reference Service)
2) CCJR (Center for Criminal Justice Research)
3) OJJDP (Office of Juvenile Justice & Delinquency)
4) Google Scholar

United State Code (U.S.C.) Lost Laws

It’s not hard to be perplexed when trying to understand the U.S. Code (link to searchable versions) and the niceties of codification. Maybe this will help:

Lost Laws: What We Can’t Find In The U.S. Code, Legal Research Plus (blog), May 23, 2010, by Paul Lomio:

(Re Article: Lost Laws: What We Can’t Find In The U.S. Code, by Will Tress, Golden Gate University Law Review, Vol. 40, Issue #2, Winter 2010, p. 129) (SSRN direct link.)

Jul 8, 2010

Oregon Federal Court Jury Instructions

Periodically we are asked about jury instructions for the Oregon federal district court. We have the following on good authority, though in the world of legal research, all is subject to variation, circumstances, and change:

1) The Oregon Federal District Court has not (as of this date) produced its own jury instructions. They do make use of the ones from the Oregon State Bar (see Oregon Uniform Criminal and Civil Jury Instructions), Ninth Circuit Jury Instructions, and check federal court Local Rules.

2 ) There are jury instructions for the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. These are also available in print and online, free:

a) Manual of Model Civil Jury Instructions
b) Criminal jury instructions (Note: Criminal Jury Instructions will be available on the court website the first week of August 2010.)

3) The commercial editions of federal court jury instructions are available for purchase:

a) Federal Jury Practice and Instructions (Thomson/West)
b) Modern Federal Jury Instructions (Lexis/Matthew Bender)

4) More about jury instructions in Svengalis, “Legal Information Buyer’s Guide and Reference Manual” and at Zimmerman’s Research Guide.

Jul 6, 2010

Oregon Judicial (Judge) Vacancies, Selection, and Election

There are a number of ways to research Oregon judicial vacancies and candidates and here are a few to start with:

1) The Oregon State Bar Judicial Vacancy website.

2) Oregon Governor’s judicial appointments website.

3) Oregon Bluebook

4) Oregon newspaper and blog searches are useful too, though one has to keep one's fact-check hat on tight. Judgepedia can be useful, but watch for election updates at official sites, for example the Oregon Secretary of State Elections webpages.

5) How about a little Oregon judicial history?

6) Not unlike some clothes from long ago that have some back into style (bell bottoms!), gubernatorial candidates coming back for a second-chance can bring with them some history (a.k.a. baggage, a concept well known by U.S. Supreme Court Judge nominees).

I was searching Washington County Bar Association newsletters for something else the other day and came across an article in the August/September 1999 issue. It was written by Henry H. Lazenby, Jr., Legal Counsel, Governor’s Office: “Kitzaber’s Approach to Judicial Appointments.”

Jul 2, 2010

(4) Places to Start Your Search for that Elusive Book Title

Libraries get a lot of those “I can’t remember that book (story, poem, etc.) title” types of questions, which we love because every good librarian loves a mystery that requires some biblio-detective work.

Even with the web, some titles remain elusive, so what’s a librarian or a reader to do?

There are a number of websites that might help with the search. A lot of sites require registration, which wouldn’t be a bad thing except it’s one more password to remember. But if you can’t get that elusive title out of your head, maybe it's worth the trouble.

I’ve listed 4 sites fellow librarians suggest and I’m sure there are many more. Don't forget those mega "Ask Me" and those "Questions?" websites, e.g. Yahoo Answers, although they can be rather labor intensive, daunting, or so diverting that you end up reading other people's questions rather than crafting your own.

1) First, be a biblio-locavore! Try local resources first: Your public or state library may have an online reference service. In Oregon, we have statewide L-net and local public library systems have their own in-house services so visit your public library’s website. Let your library staff do the research for you!

2) What’s that book? (Registration required.)

3) AskMetafilter (Registration required.)

4) Google Groups, e.g. this one, a Usenet Group (remember those?!): Discussion of written science fiction and fantasy

Jul 1, 2010

Oregon Supreme Court and Miranda Warnings (Vondehn case)

Hot on the heels of the June 30, 2010, Oregon Court of Appeals Court case on Miranda warnings, comes this July 1, 2010, Oregon Supreme Court case:

State of Oregon v. Hyatt Robin Vondehn (SC S056371):

Media Release excerpt: "Today the Oregon Supreme Court held that Article I, section 12, of the Oregon Constitution requires the police to give Miranda warnings before they conduct custodial interrogation to ensure that a suspect's decision to waive the right against self-incrimination is both knowing and voluntary. When the police fail to give Miranda warnings, they violate the Oregon Constitution and the state is precluded from using either statements that a suspect makes or physical evidence derived from that constitutional violation to prosecute a defendant. The court also held that when the police do not administer Miranda warnings at the onset of a custodial interrogation, but later correct course and deliver the required warnings, the state must establish that the belated warnings effectively and accurately inform the defendant of his or her rights to remain silent and to counsel under the Oregon Constitution...." (Link to July 1, 2010, Media Release.) (Link to full case.)

Justice Bedsworth Pays Homage to the Judicial Clerks Amongst Us

Justice Bedsworth in his July 2010 Criminal Waste of Space column, in the OC Lawyer Magazine, tells a couple of his favorite judicial clerks stories. New lawyers, especially, should pay attention:

The Power and the Glory, by Justice William W. Bedsworth, July 2010

Excerpt: “…I don’t know, there may be some 9-armed, 6-eyed, 3-brained creatures on Arcturus 7 who can handle a clerk’s duties better than Dwayne, but certainly nobody on this planet could touch him.

He pretty much picked me up and carried me(2) through my career as a trial judge. I spent my first few months on the bench puffing myself up and pronouncing my pronouncements in my most stentorian judicial tones, only to glance over at Dwayne and catch just the hint of a headshake, just the most minuscule, almost undetectable signal I had screwed up.

At that point, I would clear my throat, announce that some last minute consideration or previously undiscerned nuance had just occurred to me, and declare that I was going to hold onto the case until I had a chance to resolve the problem. Then, at recess, Dwayne would come into my chambers and explain to me that I had failed to rammelfratz the feeblevetzer or enunciate the Gazorninplat Warning or some such thing, and I would go back out onto the bench and finish the job...."
(Link to full article in the OC Lawyer Magazine.)